ارزیابی واکنش عملکرد و ویژگی‌های کیفی علوفه دو ژنوتیپ کانولا (Brassica napus) به تیمارهای قطع آبیاری و تراکم بوته

 Abid, M., Mansour, E., Ben Yahia, L., Bachar, K. H., Ben Khaled, K. H. and Ferchichi, A. 2016. Alfalfa nutritive quality as influenced by drought in South-Eastern Oasis of Tunisia. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15: 334-342.

Albayrak, S., Turk, M., Yukel, O. and Yilmaz, M. 2011. Forage yield and quality of perennial legume – grass mixtures under rainfed conditions. NotulaeBotanicaeHortiAgrobotanici, 39 (1): 114-118.

Albayrak, S. and Camas. N.2006. Performances of forageturnip (Brassica rapa) cultivars under different nitrogentreatment, JournalFac Agricultural. OMU, 21 (1): 44- 48.

Arzani, H. 2013. Fodder Quality and Daily Requirement of Livestock Grazing from The Pasture. Tehran University Publications. 278 p. (In Persian)

Bakhtiyari, F., Zamanian, M. and Golzardi, F. 2020. Effect of mixed intercropping of clover on forage yield and quality. South-Western Journal of Horticulture, Biology and Environment, 11: 49-65.

Bhimireddy, P., Mallaredy, M., Subbalah, G., Chandra, K. and Ranindar, P. 2017. Perfomance of no-till maize under drip-fertigation in a double cropping system insemiarid Telangana state of India. Maydica, 61 (1): 238- 245.

Bingol, N. T., Karsli, M. A., Yilmaz, I. H. and Bolat, D. 2007. The effects of planting time and combination on thenutrient composition and digestible dry matter yield of four mixtures of vetch varieties intercropped withbarely. Veterinary Sciences Journals, 31: 297-302.

Chen, S., Huo, Z., Xu, X. and Huang, G. 2019. Aconceptual agricultural water productivity modelconsidering under field capacity soil waterredistribution applicable for arid and semi-aridareas with deep groundwater. Agricultural Water Management, 213 (1): 309-323.

Eskandari, H., Javanmard, A. and Shekari, F. 2017. Evaluation of quality traits of forage maize cultivars as affected by different plant densities. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 10 (4): 1025-1036.

Farahani, S. M. and Chaichi, M. R. 2013. Wholeforage barley crop quality as affected bydifferent deficit irrigation and fertilizingsystems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 44 (20): 2961-2973.

Farhadi, A., Paknejad, F., Golzardi, F. and Agha Yari, F. 2022. Investigating the yield characteristics, fodder mifit and water consumption efficiency of fodder sorghum in response to different levels of drought and nitrogen stress. Environmental Stress in Crop Sciences, 5 (4): 868-879. (In Persian).

Feyzbakhsh1, M. T., Mokhtarpour, H. and Kiani, A. R. 2020. Evaluation of quantitative, qualitative yield and water productivityof two forage Amarantuse cultivars under different irrigation regimes. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 27 (2): 109-125.

Foman, A. and Khazaei, A. 2013. Evaluation of fodder performance of sorghum line in the conditions of Karaj in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Sciences of Iran, 16 (3): 190-181. (In Persian).

Ghane, M. R., Aghakhani, M. A. and Modares Sanavi, A. 2004. Effect of nitrogen levels on the production of green forage from rapeseed and autumn barley. Masters thesis in agriculture. Tarbiat Modares University. p. 200. 

HasanzadehGhorttepeh, A., Heydarzadeh, S. and Rahimi, A. 2021. Investigating the effect of chemical and organic fertilizer system on thequality and quantity of Amaranthus (cv. Cim) forage under the influence ofdifferent irrigation levels. Journal of Crop Improvement, 23 (3): 633-646. (In Persian).

Hoseini, S. S., Jalilian, J. and Gholinejad, A. 2021. Effects of some stress modifiers on morphological characteristics and quantitative and qualitative traits of quinoa fodder (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under water stress conditions. Scientific Research Journal of Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production, 31 (2): 111-128. (In Persian).

Khmadi, F., Gharineh, M. H. and Bakhshandeh, A. M. 2014. Influence of sowing dates on yield and yield component of rape forage cultivars under Ahvaz condition. Applid Field Crop Research, 27 (104): 22-28. (In Persian).

Javanmard, A., Nikdel, H. and Amani Machiani, M. 2019. Evaluation of forage quantity and quality in domesticpopulations of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.), vetch (Vicia sativa L.) and caspian vetch (Vicia hyrcanica) under rainfed condition. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Sustaiable Production, 29 (1): 15-31.

Lithourgidis, A. S., Vasilakoglou, I. B., Dhima, K. V., Dordas, C. A. and Yiakoulaki, M. D. 2006. Forage yieldand quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research, 99: 106-113.

Nematpour, A., Eshghizadeh, H. R., Zahedi, M. and Ghorbani, G. R. 2020. Millet forage yield and silage quality as affected by water and nitrogen application at different sowing dates. Grass and Forage Science, 75: 169-180.

Malhi, S. and Gill, K. S. 2004. Placement, rate and source of N, seed row spacing and seeding depth effects on canola production. Canadian Journal Plant Science, 84: 719-729.

Sadeghpour, A., Jahanzad, E., Esmaieli, A., Hosseini, M. B. and Hashemi, M. 2013. Forage yield, qualityand economic benefit of intercropped barley and annual medic in semi-arid conditions: Additive series. Field Crops Research, 148: 43-48.

Siadat, S. A. and Moradi-Telavat, M. R. 2011. Forage Crops Production. Nashr-e Daneshgahi press. 274 p. (In Persian).

Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597.

Zabarjadi, A. R. and Ghobadi, M. 2009. Response of yield and yield components of canola cultivars todifferent seeding rates in dryland conditions of Kermanshah province. Journal of Plant Production andTechnology, 9 (1): 45-53. (In Persian with English Summary).

Zavareh, M. and Emam, E. 2000. Aguide to identifying the life stages of canola. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Sciences, 1: 1-14. (In Persian).