تأثیر خلاصه‌برداری بر صحت فرادرک‌مطلب و صحت تنظیم دانش‌آموزان

Anderson, M.C.M., & Thiede, K.W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psychologica, 128, 110-118. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.10.006

Bannert, M. (2009). Promoting Self-Regulated Learning through Prompts. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23(2), 139-145. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.139.

Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1979). Note taking and depth of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4(2), 145-153. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(79)90069-9.

Castro-Alonso, J. C., de Koning, B. B., Fiorella, L., & Paas, F. (2021). Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1379-1407. doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9

Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Elicit self-explanation improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.

De Bruin, A.B.H., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. R. (2011). Generating keywords improves meta-comprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 294e310. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.005.

De Bruin, A.B.H. & van Merriënboer, J. J.G. (2017). Bridging Cognitive Load and Self-Regulated Learning Research: A complementary approach to contemporary issues in educational research. Learning and Instruction, 1-9.

Delvar, A. (2018). Experimental design in psychology and edudation. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]

Engelen, J. A. A., Camp, G., van de Pol, J. & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2018). Teachers’ monitoring of students’ text comprehension: can students’ keywords and summaries improve teachers’ judgment accuracy? Metacognition and Learning, 13, 287-307. doi:10.1007/s11409-018-9187-4

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717-741. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9.

Griffin, T., Mielicki, M., & Wiley, J. (2019). Improving students’ meta-comprehension accuracy. In J. Dunlosky & K. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 619-646). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Thiede, K.W. (2008). Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on meta-comprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 36, 93-103. Doi:10.3758/MC.36.1.93.

Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294-303. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.4.294.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring One's Own Knowledge during Study: A Cue-Utilization Approach to Judgments of Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349-370.

Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837-852. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6.

Mohebzadeh, M., Nikdel, F., & Taghvaieenia, A. (2021).Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cooperative and Metacognition Teaching Methods on Motivational Beliefs and Self-Regulated Learning among Students. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 9(17), 123-148. DOI: 10.22084/J.PSYCHOGY.2021.23098.2257 [In Persian]

Omarchevska, Y., Lachner, A., Richter, J., & Scheiter, K. (2022). Do Video Modeling and Metacognitive Prompts Improve Self‑Regulated Scientific Inquiry? Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1025-1061. doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09652-3.

Pieger, E., & Bannert, M. (2018). Differential Effects of Students’ Self-Directed Metacognitive Prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 165-173. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.022.

Redford, J. S., Thiede, K. W., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D. (2012). Concept mapping improves meta-comprehension accuracy among 7th graders. Learning and Instruction, 22, 262-270. DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.007

Salehi, M. (2014). Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of cognitive training on academic performance. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 1(1), 75-86. [In Persian].

Schleinschok, K., Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Do drawing tasks improve monitoring and control during learning from text?, Learning and Instruction, 51, 10-25. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.02.002.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.

Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can improve meta-comprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129-160.

Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.

Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2010). Poor meta-comprehension accuracy as a result of inappropriate cue use. Discourse Processes, 47, 331-362. doi:10.1080/01638530902959927.

Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Redford, J. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring during and after reading. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp.85-106). London: Routledge.

Van de Pol, J., de Bruin, A. B., van Loon, M. H., & van Gog, T. (2019). Students’ and teachers’ monitoring and regulation of students’ text comprehension: Effects of comprehension cue availability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 236-249. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.001.

Van de Pol, J., Van Loon, M., Van Gog, T., Braumann, S. & De Bruin, A. (2020). Mapping and Drawing to Improve Students’ and Teachers’ Monitoring and Regulation of Students’ Learning from Text: Current Findings and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 951-977. doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09560-y.

Van Loon, M., de Bruin, A. B.H., Leppink, A. J., & Roebers, C. (2017). Why are children overconfident? Developmental differences in the implementation of accessibility cues when judging concept learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 158, 77-94.

Van Loon, M. H., de Bruin, A. B., van Gog, T., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2014). Can students evaluate their understanding of cause-and-effect relations? The effects of diagram completion on monitoring accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 151, 143–154. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.007.

Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., & de Bruin, A.B.H. (2019). Cue-based facilitation of self-regulated learning: A discussion of multidisciplinary innovations and technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 384-391.

Wiley, J., Thiede, K. W., & Griffin, T. D. (2016). Improving meta-comprehension with the situation-model approach. In K. Mokhtari (Ed.), Improving reading comprehension through metacognitive reading instruction for first and second language readers (pp. 93–110). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Zahed, S., Dortaj, F., Asadzadeh, H., Kadivar, P., & Farrokhi, N. (2021).The Effect of Metacognitive and Emotional Prompts on the Monitoring Accuracy, Regulation Accuracy and Types of Cognitive Load in Students. Studies in Learning & Instruction, 13(1), 141-162. Doi: 10.22099/JSLI.2021.6317 [In Persian]