تبیین پردازشی فرایند خروج بند موصولی بر پایۀ دستور گفتمانی‌نقشی

-  آهنگر، عباسعلی (1379). ساخت جمله مرکب ناهمپایه در زبان فارسی برپایه نظریه حاکمیت و مرجع­گزینی، رساله دکتری زبان­شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تهران.

-  راسخ مهند، محمد (1391). «گروه حرف اضافه­ای پس از فعل: دلایل نقشی و رده شناختی»، مجموعه مقالات هشتمین همایش زبان­شناسی، به کوشش محمد دبیرمقدم، انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، 1: 280-293.

-  راسخ مهند، محمد؛ علیزاده صحرای، مجتبی؛ ایزدی­فر، راحله؛ قیاسوند، مریم (1391). «تبیین نقشی خروج بند موصولی در زبان فارسی»، مجله پژوهش­های زبان­شناسی، 1: 21-40 .

-  Baltin, M, (1984). “Extraposition Rules and Discontinuous Constituent”, Linguistic Inquiry,15: 157-163.

-  Bybee, J., & Hopper, P, (Eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

-  Culicover, P. & M. Rochemont (1990). “Extraposition and the Complement Principle”, Linguistic Inquiry,21: 23-47.

-  Gibson, E, (1998). “Linguistic complexity: locality and syntactic dependencies”, Cognition, 68: 1-76.

-  Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An Introduction, Amsterdam, John BenjaminsPublishing Company.

-  Greenberg, H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements, In Universals of grammar, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73: 113. 2nd ed. 1966, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

-  Haider, H. & Rosengren.I, (2003). “Scrambling: Nontriggered Chain Formation in OV Language”, Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 15: 203-267.

-  Haspelmath, M. (2005). The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

-  Hartmann, R. (1997). “From contrastive textology to parallel corpora”, In language history and linguistic modeling, Edited by R. Hickey and S. Puppel. Mouton de Gruyte.

-  Hawkins, J. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

-  Hawkins, J. (2004). Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

-  Hawkins, J. (2007). “Processing typology and why psychologists need to know about it”, New Ideas in Psychology, (25): 87-107.

-  Hawkins, J.A. (2014). Cross-linguistic variation and efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

-  Hengeveld, K. (2013). A New approach to clausal constituent order. In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar.  Edited by J. L. Mackenzie Hella Olberts.

-  Hengeveld, K. & Mackenzie, L. (2008). Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

-  Hengeveld, K. & Mackenzie, L. (2005). Dynamic expression in Functional Discourse Grammar, In Casper de Groot, andKees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar (Functional Grammar Series27). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 53-86.

-  Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.

-  Keizer, E. (2015). A Functional Discourse Grammar for English. first edition, Oxford Press.

-  Klooster, W.G (2002). The syntax of relativization, Netherlands: Utrecht: de vrice.

-  Koster, J. (1995). “Extraposition as coordination”, Talk presented at MPI and Von HumboldtUniversität, Berlin.

-  Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

-  Reinhart, T. (1980). “On the Position of Extraposed Clauses”, Linguistic Inquiry,11: 621-624.

-  Rijkhoek, P. (1996). “Result Clauses and Conjunction”, In: R. Jonkers et al. (eds) Language and Cognition 5, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

-  Rochemont, M. & Culicover, P. (1997). “Deriving dependent right adjuncts in English”, In: D. Beerman et al. (eds) Rightward Movement, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 279-300.

-  Wilder, C. (1995). “Rightward movement as leftward delation”, In: U. Lutz & J. Pafel (eds) Extraction and Extraposition in German, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 273-309.